Guide to the King V Report

Updated on Nov 7, 2025

Overview

The Institute of South Africa released the King V report on 31 October 2025. This report will be effective for financial years that start on or after 1 January. It’s crucial that businesses familiarise themselves with this report as it supersedes the King IV report.

The governance landscape is constantly changing, and so are the challenges faced by organisations. This environment makes the need for updated, robust standards of corporate governance, as provided by the new King V Report, more essential than ever for long-term sustainability and value creation.

In this guide, we’ll highlight where the King report began, what’s in the latest report, and what changes were made in the report that contrast with the King IV report released in 2016.

Where The King Report Began?

It’s essential to gain a clear understanding of why The King Committee exists, and how the King report has progressed from King I, all the way to King V. The King Committee began just over three decades ago in 1992 by the Institute of Directors in Southern Africa, whose name is now known as the Institute of Directors South Africa (IoDSA).

The intention behind this committee was to ensure there are standards set for corporate governance as a means to benefit the South African economy and those affected by it.

When the King model for governance began, South Africa was transitioning from a system of unequal opportunity to one of equality, and a new governance model was needed to reflect this societal shift.

At the time, governance codes worldwide, such as the Cadbury Code in the UK, focused narrowly on financial control and shareholder primacy. South Africa needed something broader and more inclusive. Encouraged by Nelson Mandela, King assembled a diverse, “rainbow” committee that represented the social and political transformation of the time.

As a means to reject the purely shareholder-focused approach, they introduced a new philosophy. Companies should make decisions in the long-term interest of the organisation, while taking into account the needs, interests, and expectations of all stakeholders. This was the birth of the stakeholder-inclusive governance model, which became the cornerstone of the King Reports.

The first King Report on Corporate Governance was King I, released in 1994. This report established South Africa as a thought leader. Following that first report were King II (2002) and King III (2009), which introduced groundbreaking concepts such as sustainability, integrated thinking, and integrated reporting. This recognised that corporate performance extends beyond financial metrics and included environmental, social, and governance (ESG) impact.

Why is There a Need for a New King Report?

You might be wondering if a new report is really necessary. The governance landscape evolves, and so do business challenges. This means a new report is required to reflect today’s global challenges. Some of these challenges include sustainability, tech evolutions, supply chain issues, and much more.

There was a need for a King report that simplifies previous frameworks, removes technical jargon, and introduces a new approach to governance. Once that is allowed, organisations to govern more transparently and effectively.

King Iv Vs King V: Key Differences

To gain an understanding of the need for an updated report, let’s have a look at the key differences between the King IV and King V codes. The differences are as follows:

1. Simplification and Accessibility

King IV (2016):

  • Very detailed and extensive, with multiple sections, annexes, and sector-specific supplements.
  • Covered all types of organisations, but it could be complex for small businesses.

King V (2025):

  • Streamlined Code and separate Disclosure Framework.
  • Written in simpler language, easier to understand and apply.
  • Designed to scale to businesses of all sizes, from SMEs to large corporations.

Key takeaway:

You don’t need to read hundreds of pages. Focus on the principles relevant to your business size and sector. King V is more practical and adaptable.

2. Outcome-Focused Governance

King IV:

  • Introduced the concept of apply and explain, you implement practices and explain how.
  • Emphasised ethical leadership, sustainability, stakeholder relationships, and integrated thinking.

King V:

  • Moves beyond just applying practices. It focuses on real governance outcomes.
  • Four key outcomes: Ethical culture, value creation and sustainable performance, effective conformance and control, and legitimacy and trust in stakeholders.

Key takeaway:

It’s no longer enough to just follow processes. Your business must demonstrate actual results: ethical behaviour, fair treatment of stakeholders, and long-term value creation.

3. New Governance Areas

King V introduces:

  • Data, information and technology governance (including AI, cybersecurity, and digital risks).
  • Stronger emphasis on systems value creation, your business exists within economic, social, and environmental systems.
  • Embedding Ubuntu‑Botho philosophy. It emphasises care for people, community, and society as part of leadership culture.

Key takeaway:

You need to think beyond finances. Protect your data, consider environmental and social impacts, and build a company culture that reflects ethical values and community responsibility.

4. Stakeholder Engagement and Ethical Leadership

King IV:

  • King IV encouraged stakeholder inclusivity, ethics, and accountability.

King V:

  • King V takes it further. Ethical leadership must start from onboarding, and stakeholders are central to governance outcomes.
  • Public sector engagement is highlighted, including corruption prevention and accountability are core.

Key takeaway:

Integrate ethics and stakeholder responsibility into your business culture from day one. It shapes employee behaviour and brand trust.

5. Disclosure and Reporting

King IV:

  • Placed an emphasis on reporting on governance practices.

King V:

  • Introduces a formal Disclosure Framework. You must show not only what you do, but whether your governance practices achieve the intended outcomes.

Key takeaway:

Prepare to show real results to investors, customers, and regulators. Reporting should reflect both processes and the impact of governance.

6. Proportionality and Flexibility

King V emphasises:

  • Adapting practices to your business size, complexity, and context.
  • SMEs and small organisations don’t need to adopt the same measures as multinational corporations, but principles still apply.

Key takeaway:

You can scale governance requirements to fit your business while still meeting King V standards. Focus on ethical decision-making, accountability, and value creation relative to your resources.

Funding

SME Funding - Get Pre-Approved

Important – Please Read Before Applying:

  • This funding is strictly for registered businesses with a valid CIPC registration number.
  • Your business must have an active business bank account (applications using personal accounts will not be accepted).
  • Minimum monthly turnover: R50,000 for the past 6 months.
  • This is not personal funding or a grant.

Applications that do not meet these requirements will, unfortunately, not be processed.